The Achievements of the Rochester School in the Field of Critical Art History
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18688/Keywords:
critical art history, Rochester School, critical approach, methodological structure, contextAbstract
This work is dealing with the problem of changing methodological structure of the art history as a discipline during the last three decades and placing the activity of the Rochester School on the map of these changes. Its most important characteristic is contextual approach to art.
References
Art: key contemporary thinkers, D. Castelo, J. Vickery eds., Berg, 2007, p. 83.
K. Moxey, Semiotics and Social History of Art, in New Literary History 4 (1991), pp. 985–1000.
K. Moxey, The Practice of Theory: Poststructuralism, Cultural Politics, Art History, Ithaca, 1994, pp. 32–37.
M. A. Cheetam, M. A. Holly, K. Moxey, The Subject of Art History. Historical Objects in Contemporary Perspective, Cambridge, 1998, p. 2.
M. A. Holly, Past Looking: Historical Imagination and the Rethoric of Image, Ithaca, 1996.
Umjetničko delo kao društvena činjenica. Perspektive kritičke povijesti umjetnosti, L. Kolešnik ed., Zagreb, 2005.
Vision and Textuality, S. Melville, B. Readings ed., Durham 1995.
What does visual studies do ? Interview with Keith Moxey, in Handwerker Gallery Newsletter Fall 1/3 (1999).
